Verdict Interpretation, Inconsistent Verdicts

When interpreting a jury’s verdict, the Court reviews the entire record to discern the intent of the jury. Robinson v. Riverside Concrete, Inc., 544 S.W. 2d. 865, 871 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976). Courts are deferential to a jury’s findings; to that end, liberal regard is given to a verdict so that the court may give it effect whenever possible. Haley v. Byers Transportation Company, 394 S.W.2d 412, 415 (Mo. 1965).

An inconsistent verdict arises when a jury’s finding on one issue negates a finding on another issue. Similarly, an inconsistent verdict may rise where a jury finds on one issue without finding on another legally necessary issue. See, eg, Williams v. Williams, 99 S.W.3d 552, 556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003) (it is an inconsistent verdict to award punitive damages without an award of actual or nominal damages). Important, if there is an inconsistent verdict, that objection must be presented to the trial court before the jury is discharged or the claim of inconsistency is waived. Douglass v. Safire, 712 S.W.2d 373, 374 (Mo. 1986).

Related Articles

Reformation Statute of Limitations

May 18, 2023

Reformation is a legal theory used to correct mistakes in a legal document. More technically, it is an “extraordinary equitable remedy and should be granted with great caution and only in clear cases of fraud or mistake.” Morris v. Brown, 941 S.W.2d 835, 840 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997). For example, in cases of mistake, the mistake…

Read More

Finality re: Collateral Estoppel, Res Judicata

May 10, 2023

Collateral estoppel is  a “court-made doctrine,” precluding re-litigation of an issue previously decided. Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc., 152 S.W.3d 270, 273 (Mo. 2004). To be “final” for collateral estoppel purposes, a judgment need only be “sufficiently firm to be accorded conclusive effect.” Ogle v. Guardsman Ins. Co., 701 S.W.2d 469, 471 (Mo. App….

Read More

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

April 25, 2023

Before filing a lawsuit relating to the actions of an administrative agency, a litigant must typically exhaust all administrative remedies. Indeed, “[i]t is well settled that when an administrative remedy is available[,] such remedy must be exhausted before a court may give injunctive or declaratory relief.” Mo. Health Care Ass’n v. Mo. Dep’t of Soc. Servs.,…

Read More

Harmless Error

April 18, 2023

To prevail as the appealing party on an appeal, you must demonstrate that there is reversible error. Very generally, “reversible error” is an error which affects the outcome of a case and prejudices the losing party. State v. Buamruk, 280 S.W.3d 600, 614 (Mo. 2009). This can be a tall hill to climb. For instance, if an appellant…

Read More
Scroll to Top