Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP)

Missouri, like most states, has laws prohibiting and/or creating liability for strategic lawsuits against public participation (“SLAPP”). 

Under Missouri’s Anti-SLAPP statute in Section 537.528, RSMo, an action seeking money damages against a person for conduct or speech occurring in connection with a public hearing or meeting is subject to special motions to dismiss, for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment, and such motions are to be considered on an expedited basis. Moschenross v. St. Louis County, 188 S.W.3d 13, 24 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006). 

Importantly, the statute is limited to meetings established and held by a “state or local governmental entity, including without limitations meetings or presentations before state, county, city town or village councils, planning commissions, review boards or commissions.” Section 537.528.4, RSMo. 

A prevailing party may also be awarded his/her/its reasonable attorney fees. Contact. 

Related Articles

Equitable Relief, Pleadings

December 9, 2023

At trial, a court is limited to the relief requested in the pleadings. The “pleadings” generally refers to the petition, answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaim. While there are numerous exceptions to this, a prominent exception includes equitable relief. While Missouri courts are restrained from deciding an unpleaded fatual issue, a court of equity grant any…

Read More

Premises Liability: Third-Party Criminal Acts

November 22, 2023

As a general rule, if a customer/invitee of a business is harmed by a third-party criminal act, the business is not responsible. The rationale for this rule is that criminal acts are rarely foreseeable. Early v. Dunn, 670 S.W.3d 47, 51 (Mo. App. E.D. 2023). There are a number of exceptions. First, a duty arises…

Read More

Mootness, Exceptions

October 19, 2023

Courts generally shy away from rendering decisions in moot cases. A case is moot when “the question presented for decision seeks a judgment upon some matter which, if the judgment was rendered, would not have any practical effect upon any then existing controversy.” DCM v. Pemiscot County Juvenile Office, 578 S.W.3d 776, 780 (Mo. 2019). There…

Read More

Comity, Multiple Lawsuits, Litigation

October 11, 2023

In complex situations, it is not uncommon for multiple lawsuits to be pending in multiple jurisdictions. When this occurs, one court, in the interests of comity, may allow the other court to handle the entire dispute. At the state level in Missouri, comity is not an ironclad rule, but a rule of “practice, convenience, and…

Read More
Scroll to Top