Negligent Failure to Procure Insurance

Most think of insurance disputes as relating to the nature and extent of coverage (e.g., uninsured motorist and underinsured motorist) or how much of the policy limits should be paid. There are circumstances, however, when the incorrect insurance is obtained and a claim  exists against the insurance agent/broker.
An insurance agent/broker who is tasked with obtaining insurance for another for compensation has a responsibility to obtain the insurance requested, and the agent/broker may be sued for negligence if the proper insurance is not procured. Extended Stay, Inc. v. American Auto. Ins. Co., 375 S.W.3d 834, 841 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012). To prove a negligent failure to procure insurance case, you must demonstrate that (1) the agent/broker agreed to procure insurance for compensation, that (2) the agent/broker failed to procure the agreed upon insurance, and that (3) the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the failure.
 
Contact us with questions.

Related Articles

Tortious Interference: “Improper Means”

August 23, 2023

Tortious interference with business expectancies or contractual relations claims are difficult to make. Tortious interference in Missouri has five elements: (1) the plaintiff was involved in a valid business relationship; (2) the defendant was aware of that relationship; (3) the defendant intentionally interfered with that relationship, inducing its termination; (4) the defendant acted without justification; and…

Read More

Abandoned Pleadings

August 2, 2023

Once a pleading — whether it be a petition, answer, etc. —  is amended the prior iteration of the pleading is considered “abandoned.” Unless the subsequent pleading adopts or incorporates the contents of a prior pleading, the abandoned pleadings is largely irrelevant. In no uncertain terms, Missouri courts have described it as a “mere scrap…

Read More

Appealing Dismissals Without Prejudice

July 28, 2023

The default rule is that only judgments on the merits or dismissals with prejudice may be appealed. Dismissals without prejudice mean that the litigant can re-plead and pursue the claims; so, the court of appeals is often reluctant to touch a dismissal without prejudice until the trial court had made a final decision. To that end, there…

Read More

Strict Construction, Implied Authority to Act as Attorney-in-Fact

July 14, 2023

Power of attorney instruments are “strictly construed.” In re Estate of Lambur, 397 S.W.3d 54, 65 (Mo. App. S.D. 2013). While the definition of strict construction varies depending on who you ask, most agree that it calls for a more narrow, literal interpretation of a document. A strict construction, though, does not preclude “implied authority to…

Read More
Scroll to Top