Constructive Trust: Unjust Enrichment and Breach of Fiduciary Duty

A constructive trust is an equitable device to “remedy a situation where a party has been wrongfully deprived of some right, title or interest in property as a result of fraud or violation of confidence of faith reposed in another.” Lynch v. Lynch, 260 S.W.3d 834, 837 (Mo. 2008).  It may also provide a remedy in case of unjust enrichment or breach of fiduciary duty. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Hiles, 670 S.W.2d 134, 137 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

“To establish a constructive trust, an extraordinary degree of proof is required.” Fix v. Fix, 847 S.W.2d 762, 765 (Mo. 1993). “The evidence must be so clear, cogent, and convincing as to exclude every reasonable doubt in the mind of the trial court.” Id. At the same time, however, courts are not bound by an “unyielding formula” in imposing a constructive trust. Douglass v. Douglass, 570 S.W.3d 130, 136 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019). Indeed, there is not a requirement of legal wrongdoing or wrongful or malicious intent. Id.

Related Articles

Premises Liability: Third-Party Criminal Acts

November 22, 2023

As a general rule, if a customer/invitee of a business is harmed by a third-party criminal act, the business is not responsible. The rationale for this rule is that criminal acts are rarely foreseeable. Early v. Dunn, 670 S.W.3d 47, 51 (Mo. App. E.D. 2023). There are a number of exceptions. First, a duty arises…

Read More

Determining a Grantor’s Intent in Trusts

November 4, 2023

When interpreting a trust, the Settlor’s “intent is controlling and such intention must be ascertained primarily from the trust instrument as a whole.” Berezo v. Berezo, 628 S.W.3d 737, 743-44 (Mo. App. E.D. 2021). Because language and circumstances vary, the Court must examine “the specific language as well as the surrounding circumstances.” Matter of TR…

Read More

Mootness, Exceptions

October 19, 2023

Courts generally shy away from rendering decisions in moot cases. A case is moot when “the question presented for decision seeks a judgment upon some matter which, if the judgment was rendered, would not have any practical effect upon any then existing controversy.” DCM v. Pemiscot County Juvenile Office, 578 S.W.3d 776, 780 (Mo. 2019). There…

Read More

Comity, Multiple Lawsuits, Litigation

October 11, 2023

In complex situations, it is not uncommon for multiple lawsuits to be pending in multiple jurisdictions. When this occurs, one court, in the interests of comity, may allow the other court to handle the entire dispute. At the state level in Missouri, comity is not an ironclad rule, but a rule of “practice, convenience, and…

Read More
Scroll to Top